These are those canines of the upper dental arch that do not erupt when they should, around the age of eleven, and in their place remain the milk canines. It is not infrequent that the lack of the definitive canine in the mouth goes unnoticed by the patient until the milk canine begins to move and finally falls out, in adulthood. The frequency of canine included in the palate -CIP-in the general population is around 1.7%.
The lack of space in the arch or the persistence of the deciduous canine, usually pointed out as the cause of the inclusion of the canine, are not relevant. On the one hand, people with CIP do not usually present significant space limitations in the arch and, on the other hand, the persistence of the deciduous canine is the consequence, and not the cause, of the ectopic eruption -out of place- of the permanent canine. The genetic origin of CIPs is the most probable etiology in most of them. They go in this direction:
Clinically: we will suspect the existence of CIP:
If a canine is not palpable, and by dental age it should be in the arch, the next step is to find out where it is (vestibular – outside – or palatal), and how it is (what is its three-dimensional disposition: more or less horizontal-medial-cranial), as well as its relationship with the roots of the neighboring teeth, especially the lateral incisor.
Orthopantomography or panoramic radiography usually gives us enough information to determine whether the canine is palatally or vestibularly located. Nowadays, we recommend routinely requesting a CAT scan-computed axial tomography-to know its precise three-dimensional location, as well as its relationship with the roots of the neighboring teeth, which is very useful information to “discover” it during surgery.
In the case of an IPC we can choose to (a) do nothing, (b) extract it or (c) bring it orthodontically into the arch – transalveolar autotransplantation is not discussed here.
In children and adolescents, parents understand very well that the best therapeutic option is to place the permanent canine in the dental arch.
In adults, initially, doubts usually arise, generally due to a certain lack of information. Basically they ask themselves whether it is worth placing the tooth included in the arch with orthodontics -time and appliances-, or whether it is better to place a false tooth -prosthesis- in its place. In a very schematic way we will say:
For all of the above reasons, the best option, in the vast majority of cases, will be to place the included canine in its place with orthodontics .
Exceptionally, it will be recommended to extract the CIP:
Treatment Sequence: once placed on the palate
In adults, treatment begins with the placement of brackets on all the teeth of the upper arch. The baby canine is kept in the arch, for esthetic reasons, until the canine begins to be tractioned and its absence is concealed. In adolescents we will begin treatment when the patient has the definitive dentition, with or without the presence of the molars at the age of 12. If the patient presents other types of dental or skeletal problems, depending on their nature, they will be treated before or during the treatment of the included canine. Sometimes, when the CIP is palpated, we perform the surgical exposure of the canine before placing the appliances. Appliance: brackets on all teeth in the arch. We do not use anchorage braces. The appliances used are basically the same as in a simple tooth alignment case. Surgery: it is an outpatient procedure, not traumatic, performed under local anesthesia. A window is made on the mucosa of the palate to access the enamel of the canine. During this procedure a pin is glued on the canine to be able to pull the canine – similar to a bracket. Duration: the placement of a CIP in your arch, in the absence of other accompanying alterations, usually requires about 24-28 months of treatment.